Best crosswords com7/26/2023 ![]() ![]() If you are stuck with a tricky clue, have some missing crosswords letters, or are uncertain if you have a legitimate crosswords answer, their Crossword Solver and Crossword Dictionary Lookup tools are perfect for you.Ĭrossword Palace provides hundreds of free, original, printable crosswords and Sudoku puzzles. You can also use their site to help you finish off that vexing crossword puzzle. They also offer other word games.ī offers a collection of thousands of free crossword puzzles, adding a new one daily. All the crossword puzzles on the site are free and play directly in your web browser.ĭ offers a free interactive Daily Crossword puzzle that allows you to save your progress, as well as crossword help through their Crossword Solver. There are also free Word Search puzzles available.ī offers a variety of online and printable crossword puzzles. Puzzles are available all the way back to March 2000, although the earlier puzzles may not be of good quality, according to the author. These puzzles cannot be completed online they must be printed. ![]() Clue of the fortnightĪ reminder from Philistine that we should always try to break up things that look as if they should be joined together in this classy clue …ġ1aSpace in New Orleans for a Londoner (6,6)įind a collection of explainers, interviews and other helpful bits and bobs at Puzzles, Word Puzzles and More uploads at least one word puzzle or crossword each day. Please leave entries for the current competition – as well as your non-print finds and picks from the broadsheet cryptics – in the comments. The winner, for its apt “delivery” is “Sean Connery’s settee delivery driver”. The runners-up are Thepoisonedgift’s sneaky “Display/hide broadcast for Taxi Driver?” and Croquem’s elegant “Master of the Rolls?”. There’s an audacity award for Rakali, who appears to have invented a new and unmanageable format: Reader, how would you clue PIVOT? Cluing competition It’s also one which is always best responded to by impersonating either Ross or Chandler in the Friends couch scene: The new “going forward” is the partner of another term, which is the subject of our next challenge. Instead of the right thing (“You’re quite right, we are now irredeemably toxic”) we hear, ironically, “we are listening going forward”. These days, though, I hear it most often from the comms team of a scandal-addled institution. It was reasonable to hope that its overuse might mean it would fall from favour. In a slightly stabler world, it offered merely a way to pad a sentence with an unearned sense of purpose indeed, the Financial Times’ Lucy Kellaway thought it might have come from the Securities and Exchange Commission. “Going forward” is, to my ears, enjoying a revival. If your experience has been terrible, wretched or ridiculous, it will be ignored or – worse – will prompt some going-forwardism. When you hear these seven words in the real world, there is no point answering. The puzzle’s spine has the clue “How was your experience with us today? (1,6,2,5)”, a phrase that’s only acceptable in the context of someone messing about, as Starhorse is. I will say no more than that the level of fooling is extremely high. At Big Dave’s, the blog for all things Telegraph, the setter normally known as Starhorse created something for the Not the Saturday Prize Puzzle series. Last week’s celebration of the return of fooling in 1 April puzzles omitted to mention at least one example. Meanwhile, Beefeaters strike rarely but not never, an image evoked in this Telegraph clue …Ģd Strike illegally, putting crown jewels in danger? (3,5,3,4) ![]() … but the “putting inside” is indicated by “looking after”, the nurses are the Royal College of Nursing and the answer is URCHIN. From Bluth – known locally as Fed – a couple of clues acknowledging what’s going on in our hospitals, one referring to recession and another where I said to myself, “Oho, I won’t be fooled, ‘nurses’ surely means I’ll be putting one thing inside another” …ģd Union’s leader on nurses looking after heart of this poor child (6) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |